
Generally I'll just stop

ying after the first bad beat if it's

ted me that much. T

look back over the hand and check that it's a genuine bad beat and I got my money in good...
I think

ning slow and sometimes

ing fast is why it's

led grinding.
If I s

l have the urge to

y (typi

ly after I walk away for ten mintues) I change tables. I find myself seeking "r

nge" on the person who gave me the bad beat and t

I

rt leaking like crazy and making bad decisions

of spike.
M

si

tions are clear cut, but I Think a lot of times there's a l

l of mis-

y where you may have paid off a bad

l making it "

" a bad beat.
The biggest reason that Bad Be

are so expensive? Because they effect you long after t

had has passed.
Also. W

you only have 100bb in front of you,

ting

cked

h top pair top kicker is a lot more acceptable than w

you have 350bb in front of you. Getting

cked like that is a HUGE no no.
Rarely w

we

our monies in, are we a 100% (or

n a 90%) favorite to

. T

provides our oppon

s

h many opportunities to suck

on us.
It also accounts for 95% of poker-related m

al-illnesses.
The more you grind, the more bad be

you see, and the less they sting w

you

them. They are simply an inevitable part of t

game that you've just got to accept. Some days you'll see more than your fair share, and some days you'll see less. Try

to go crazy on the former, and try

to

cocky on the latter.
The bad be

c

you money, but

the hand itself. Over the long run you s

ld

c

er and c

er to what your expected value was over all hands that you

yed. For example you really want your oppon

to make -EV

ls

h draws, or

l you preflop

h weaker hands (same concept)... that's wh

making you money.
Maybe visualizing your equity helps. If you

it in as a 70/30 favourite - only 70% of the pot is yours. 30% belongs to your oppon

.
I agree how

r that it's s

l hard to deal

h over the short term. I t

ght I was pretty bad beat resist

, and I can go on 5 buy-in downs

gs and more or less shrugg it off, but t

month I'm running 50% under my expectation over 30k hands for �1000, and that's s

l hard to stomach. I won't

that money back, but at least I know that over the course of the next 100k hands it won't matter.
A big part of the psychology of it is that you got emotionally attached to the pot, but the pot is

yours if you don't have the

ning hand on the river. I made it a ri

l to click reload at alm

ry all-in si

tion, just to prepare for loosing the pot. The be

that

t the m

are w

you fully expected that the pot was yours.
LOSING IS A PART OF THE GAME! Sorry to be so blunt but Somebody has to

, somebody has to

e. Pro's also

e hands so obviously, anybody can and do! WIth

the ac

l hand t

gh, we have to take your word that it was ac

lly a BAD BEAT and

a hand you got married to...

death (BB) do you part!
The question isn't why are bad be

so c

ly to one's bankroll because if they were c

ly to one's bankroll, t

one wouldn't be rolled properly for the

kes.
The question is, why does one or two bad be

destroy 2/3 of the income that took two

rs to grind up? It's so frustrating w

you spend two

rs in tedium grinding away at 6 tables, taking down small pots,

ting c

er and c

er to the nearest benchmark, only to have alm

all of that work done for

hing because some lucky idiot hit a full

se

h 69o w

you hit your flush.
Stop looking at poker in terms of sessions and whether good luck or bad be

define them. Start looking at the big picture and be more results ori

ed in the long-term. And if you got your money in good and some fish made a horrible

l and sucked

on the river, so be it because you'll want him to make that same horrible

l over and over again.
If I feel prone to

ting and

ting emotionally attached in a given si

tion I make a point to think over my decision once more, put all the money in, reload and look at a differ

table as the hand

ys

and t

try to for

ab

it.
In t

, I am giving up the edge that the additional information (what he ac

lly

yed t

way) can give me in future hands (t

gh I can of course always check the hand

tory), but I am pr

nting

t, which allows me to

y better for longer.
The si

tions that are m

likely to cause

t are m

ly self created. Basi

ly what you do is you envision one result as the one you are going for (you

ning, typi

ly), you

emotionally attached to that

come and

n if you might intellec

lly accept that other

comes are possible, you do

prepare yourself emotionally for those other possible

comes. So w

they occur they s

l manage to shock you and that

rts the whole rollercoaster of

t.
I beli

the trick is to learn to be intellec

lly and emotionally prepared for any of the remaining 47 or 46 cards to come

h

rything that

ails, and to under

nd how that effects your equity before it suddenly comes around and slaps you in the face

h the

s of a

ck. I think a great way to build t

resiliency is to analyse hands and si

tions to a point where you more intuitively under

nd how equity changes depending on what cards come. T

s

ld remove some of the surprise elem

and allow you to assess dispassionately whether your action was +EV in the first

ce and

bogged down in whether or

the

come in t

particular hand gained or c

you money.
As some of the more experienced people in t

thread also said - if you under

nd your equity against your oppon

s range on a given street

culate

h

ning your 70% and

ing the oppon

s 30% in your head and in your emotions, ignoring the ac

l

come of the hand - t

s

ld help

tproof you. You do need to

y mind-games

h yourself and practice t

particular perspective and technique for it to be effective, but it's a pretty important thing to do as

ying on

t will c

you lots more money than you can earn by

ying well.
Bad be

are c

ly- suck

s are profitable.
Become better at suck

s and avoid bad be

. You need to really push hands like backdoor flushes, gutshots and underpairs/ undercards hard in order to become the Suck

King. Follo

g the same line of reasoning you s

ld fold w


r you know you are in front.
On a more serious

e, maybe you are

pushing your edges hard enough? If you only push 70/30 si

tions and folding 55/45 si

tions your good hands need to hold up often to su

in a profitable

rate.
Couple of t

ghts:
- You grind and grind un

you

e a big pot- t

quit.
- Losing feels worse than

ning feels good.
- Suck

s are common for fish and sharks,

for TAG fish
- Everything is possible in poker. Sometimes you can

e

n how hard you try.
No comments:
Post a Comment